"I, Zombie" successfully pulls the zombie genre out of the clichéd assumption that the walking dead congregate in groups and enjoy their feasting on human flesh. Writer-director Andrew Parkinson takes a more sensitive route, presenting us with a likable young chap who, after an argument with his girlfriend, finds himself out in the countryside, where he is bitten by a feral woman. The rest of the movie, as the subtitle implies, is a document of his loneliness and pain as he's turned into a reluctant, decomposing killer. While the makeup FX are a bit rough in spots and some of the events become redundant, Parkinson delivers some disquieting imagery (including screwed-in metal plates covering up wounds) and invokes surprising sympathy for the protagonist's plight. Visually, the film possesses a look and tone akin to the work of Jorg Buttgereit ("Nekromantik," "Schramm"), and carries a similarly deeply felt effect.
37 Reviews
This is a credible zombie flick.
buchass24 March 2004
Warning: Spoilers
(SPOILERS! SPOILERS! SPOILERS SPOILERS!)
1- This is a credible zombie movie...
2- Worth to watch, but once, only...
3- Is a good critic to the human condition...
4- Is a depressing film...
5- The guy is a good actor...
6- The music is okay...
7- I don't like films with masturbating zombies...
8- The chick sucks :p
9- In the end, he stays with is face very fatty...too much fat for a zombie!
Is a good movie but not for the real zombie movie fans...This film is a mix of evening BBC prime series and "Lucio Fulci" zombies movies and a touch of the "Independent Ultra Violent Cinema" style, that produce films like "Eu,Zombie 1 and 2.."
1- This is a credible zombie movie...
2- Worth to watch, but once, only...
3- Is a good critic to the human condition...
4- Is a depressing film...
5- The guy is a good actor...
6- The music is okay...
7- I don't like films with masturbating zombies...
8- The chick sucks :p
9- In the end, he stays with is face very fatty...too much fat for a zombie!
Is a good movie but not for the real zombie movie fans...This film is a mix of evening BBC prime series and "Lucio Fulci" zombies movies and a touch of the "Independent Ultra Violent Cinema" style, that produce films like "Eu,Zombie 1 and 2.."
At least it's different.
BA_Harrison26 April 2016
Written, directed and edited by Andrew Parkinson, I Zombie: The Chronicles of Pain stars Giles Aspen as tragic PHD student Mark, who gradually succumbs to a degenerative disease after being bitten by a woman he encounters while on a field trip. Developing a hunger for human flesh, Giles is unable to return to the home he shares with his girlfriend Sarah (Ellen Softley), and so he does a runner, renting out a flat where he proceeds to document his slow transition into a rotting ghoul, which includes finding human victims for food.
Low budget zombie movies are ten a penny, but rarely do they offer much in the way of originality; it's always interesting to find something that attempts to breath new life into the tired genre. I Zombie: The Chronicles of Pain is one such film, an existential horror flick that provides a thought-provoking insight into the mind of a man doomed to a horrific existence; this alone qualifies it as a worthwhile effort for fans of the living dead—never mind the zombie masturbation scene that sees poor Giles literally pulling one off!
However, as different as this all is, the film isn't an entirely successful venture, suffering from an excruciatingly slow pace that makes it seem a lot longer than 79 minutes, a couple of weak performances, and not nearly enough gore for this particular viewer. Thankfully, the low budget aesthetic and technical shortcomings do nothing to detract further from the film's effectiveness—if anything, they help lend the film a much-needed sense of realism.
Parkinson's next film, Dead Creatures, would be a virtual rehash of I Zombie, albeit with multiple female 'zombies', indicating that the hardly prolific director was already struggling for fresh ideas.
5.5/10, rounded up to 6 for IMDb.
Low budget zombie movies are ten a penny, but rarely do they offer much in the way of originality; it's always interesting to find something that attempts to breath new life into the tired genre. I Zombie: The Chronicles of Pain is one such film, an existential horror flick that provides a thought-provoking insight into the mind of a man doomed to a horrific existence; this alone qualifies it as a worthwhile effort for fans of the living dead—never mind the zombie masturbation scene that sees poor Giles literally pulling one off!
However, as different as this all is, the film isn't an entirely successful venture, suffering from an excruciatingly slow pace that makes it seem a lot longer than 79 minutes, a couple of weak performances, and not nearly enough gore for this particular viewer. Thankfully, the low budget aesthetic and technical shortcomings do nothing to detract further from the film's effectiveness—if anything, they help lend the film a much-needed sense of realism.
Parkinson's next film, Dead Creatures, would be a virtual rehash of I Zombie, albeit with multiple female 'zombies', indicating that the hardly prolific director was already struggling for fresh ideas.
5.5/10, rounded up to 6 for IMDb.
The ultimate existentialist zombie movie
R. J.14 April 2003
Andrew Parkinson's debut feature is a brave try at making the ultimate existentialist zombie movie, following a graduate student (Giles Aspen) infected by the zombie disease during a country walk and his progressive yielding to the hunger for human flesh. Intercutting "present-day" TV-style interviews with his girlfriend and the friends he lost touch with after his disappearance with his own experiences as he progressively succumbs to the primary urge to survive, there's much to admire in the straight-faced approach to the premise and in the bold clinical way in which Parkinson documents the gradual loss of Mark's humanity. Not surprisingly, the amateurish home-movie visuals (the film was actually shot in 16mm over a two-year period) lend some power to the conceit; the basic problem with "I Zombie" is that the script is insufficiently developed for a feature and should have stayed just under the hour-long mark. Alternatively you may try and see it as a laugh, but you'll be surprised just how quickly the laughs die down under the film's dark spell.
A Chronic of Pain.....in the ass!
Albino Rhino8 March 2000
This is the worst movie ever made. The production was crappy and the plot, while innovative, was weak and slow. I am huge fan of zombie movies and Fangora magazine. When I heard they were making a movie I thought "Wow! I bet that is gonna rawk!" When I finally seen it I changed my tune. It was a great idea but it was executed poorly. I don't want some "thinking man's zombie" that cries when he kills people. Maybe I am spoiled by such horror greats as "Dawn of the Dead" and "Dead Alive" but I want more than one whiney, tree-hugging, zombie bitch-boy. When the best part of your movie is a man pulling off his dong because he won't give up the "thing" he loves, then you need to put it back in its little film can and throw it in the river with Hoffa. This is a horrible movie and every copy needs to be burned before someone in the future gets ahold of it and thinks that we were all loved crying, masturbating zombies. I wouldn't want that on my consience, would you? HA!
Cheap production, good idea.
emmadysonuk7 March 2006
Warning: Spoilers
The premise of this film is interesting in its detailed commentary (mostly in voice-over)on the emotional impact of the disease and need to kill. We see our main character move from a distanced scientist into a confused, plotting but self-disgusted victim, and while the music is occasionally overblown, and some of the dream/hallucinatory sequences reek of eighties pop videos, the overall idea is well-thought out, especially in the interviews with his unaware ex-partner and friends. The detailing of Davids descent into decay, and the sequences of feeding on and destroying his victims remains moves from clinical precision to heartbreaking isolation. This one is for those who realise that zombies all have an intensely personal and painful history to each walking corpse, and is not just about gore and spectacle. A zombie film for thinkers who can appreciate the idea and attempt, even if it does not always work.
Boring take on the zombie genre
The_Void14 June 2009
The problem with the zombie genre post-Night of the Living Dead is that there's only really one way to do a film in this genre. Several other ways have been tried, but almost always end in failure; and I, Zombie is certainly a massive failure. The film tries to strip the zombie genre down to its core and focuses just on one man turning into a zombie. This is all well and good except for the fact that the film tries to be far too arty and the result is just boredom. The film only lasts for about eighty minutes, but it really does feel far too long and it really drags. The film was obviously made on a very low budget, and so some credit has to go to writer-director Andrew Parkinson for all his efforts...but not too much because the film is a big failure. The only really interesting scene is the often mentioned masturbation sequence, and it's really not THAT interesting, and certainly not worth seeking out and watching the whole film for. Overall, I appreciate that this film is trying to do something different with an overpopulated genre; but it didn't work and I was really bored with it.
Underrated jewel with a very different view on the Zombie sub-genre
jluis198429 November 2005
Many people think that horror movies are mindless popcorn movies for those who enjoy violence. Probably those people have not seen many horror films to begin with so this is a movie I would show to people like those. This movie breaks that false mold and is truly an emotional Tour De Force that plays with your emotions and truly moves you.
Director Andrew Parkinson's first movie tells the story of Mark(Giles Aspen), a young man who is bitten by a dying woman while he was on a field trip. After this he begins to experience a serious transformation of his biological functions. The wound doesn't heal and he begins to decay, also, a hunger for human flesh makes his life impossible. HE locks himself in an apartment and we are witnesses of how his life is destroyed by the "disease".
The Zombie condition is presented as a metaphor for AIDS or similar diseases, we watch how he has to end up his relationship with his girlfriend(whom he loves very much) and mixed within the film, we see in a documentary-style fashion interviews with her about how she has moved on with her life. All this surely have a great impact in the audience, a sense of how the isolation of the sick destroys the mind at the same time the disease destroys their bodies.
It's a very unusual and original take on the zombie genre, as Mark struggles to retain his mind while he is without a doubt turning into a zombie fueled by hunger.
As I wrote above, the movie is very touching, and the acting of Giles Aspen carries the film with power and makes us sympathetic for him, who tries to keep his humanity even when we, the audience knows that it's very possible that he will fail in his attempt.
The direction is solid, and even when most of the time the movie is set in the apartment, it never becomes tiresome or boring. Most of the make-up & effects are simply average, which is understandable, although the transformation of Mark is quite outstanding considering the budget.
I must warn you about the infamous scenes of this movie. Without spoiling things, I must say that there are a few scenes that may be disgusting due to Mark's gruesome decay. It's gory and disgusting, but nothing serious. Nevertheless, consider yourself warned.
The tag line reads: "His soul was the last to go", and truly the movie lives up to that premise. Sure, after the end of the movie you will probably feel depressed, but at the same time, thankful for being alive and healthy.
8/10. Good effort.
Director Andrew Parkinson's first movie tells the story of Mark(Giles Aspen), a young man who is bitten by a dying woman while he was on a field trip. After this he begins to experience a serious transformation of his biological functions. The wound doesn't heal and he begins to decay, also, a hunger for human flesh makes his life impossible. HE locks himself in an apartment and we are witnesses of how his life is destroyed by the "disease".
The Zombie condition is presented as a metaphor for AIDS or similar diseases, we watch how he has to end up his relationship with his girlfriend(whom he loves very much) and mixed within the film, we see in a documentary-style fashion interviews with her about how she has moved on with her life. All this surely have a great impact in the audience, a sense of how the isolation of the sick destroys the mind at the same time the disease destroys their bodies.
It's a very unusual and original take on the zombie genre, as Mark struggles to retain his mind while he is without a doubt turning into a zombie fueled by hunger.
As I wrote above, the movie is very touching, and the acting of Giles Aspen carries the film with power and makes us sympathetic for him, who tries to keep his humanity even when we, the audience knows that it's very possible that he will fail in his attempt.
The direction is solid, and even when most of the time the movie is set in the apartment, it never becomes tiresome or boring. Most of the make-up & effects are simply average, which is understandable, although the transformation of Mark is quite outstanding considering the budget.
I must warn you about the infamous scenes of this movie. Without spoiling things, I must say that there are a few scenes that may be disgusting due to Mark's gruesome decay. It's gory and disgusting, but nothing serious. Nevertheless, consider yourself warned.
The tag line reads: "His soul was the last to go", and truly the movie lives up to that premise. Sure, after the end of the movie you will probably feel depressed, but at the same time, thankful for being alive and healthy.
8/10. Good effort.
Zombie masturbation!
mrush19 January 2007
Yeah I got your attention.I happened upon a DVD of this movie after reading glowing reviews of it at several horror websites.I guess these reviewers are more easily impressed than I am.
A writer doing some research in a remote location is suddenly attacked by a woman who seems to be severely injured.What had actually happened was he was attacked by a zombie.He returns home, isolates himself from family and friends and slowly we watch his body and mind turn into a zombie as he tries to deal with the myriad of problems one has while living the zombie lifestyle.
Several things are never explained ,such as why he seems to be the only one that was attacked.City life goes on around him without one mention by anyone of an outbreak of zombie attacks.And where did the zombie come from that attacked him? But the biggest question concerns how he changes into a zombie.It is slow and gradual.He deals with procuring his food supply in a very methodical way.He bandages his decaying flesh. Now when was the last time you've ever seen anyone change into a zombie over weeks and months and worry over their health? Anyway the action is almost nonexistent.The zombie in training attacks one person at a time and eats some meat but it is done in a very calm and almost bloodless matter and then he cleans his mess after he is done eating.What a boring zombie life this guy has.
This movie is mainly known for the masturbation scenes in which our hero takes out pictures of his girlfriend and ,well,masturbates.
One masturbation session ends in tragedy for him and offers the really only good moment this film has.
This movie is overly long and moves at a snails pace.The special effects are tame and homemade looking .In fact they probably are as this whole movie has the look of a film that was shot on a shoestring budget with a cast of 4 or 5 folks.Sometimes that works but in this film it doesn't.This movie in one word would be-boring.
Still it is hard for me to hate this film too much because you just know the guy who made this thing poured his heart and soul into it.
But still that doesn't always make for a good movie.
A writer doing some research in a remote location is suddenly attacked by a woman who seems to be severely injured.What had actually happened was he was attacked by a zombie.He returns home, isolates himself from family and friends and slowly we watch his body and mind turn into a zombie as he tries to deal with the myriad of problems one has while living the zombie lifestyle.
Several things are never explained ,such as why he seems to be the only one that was attacked.City life goes on around him without one mention by anyone of an outbreak of zombie attacks.And where did the zombie come from that attacked him? But the biggest question concerns how he changes into a zombie.It is slow and gradual.He deals with procuring his food supply in a very methodical way.He bandages his decaying flesh. Now when was the last time you've ever seen anyone change into a zombie over weeks and months and worry over their health? Anyway the action is almost nonexistent.The zombie in training attacks one person at a time and eats some meat but it is done in a very calm and almost bloodless matter and then he cleans his mess after he is done eating.What a boring zombie life this guy has.
This movie is mainly known for the masturbation scenes in which our hero takes out pictures of his girlfriend and ,well,masturbates.
One masturbation session ends in tragedy for him and offers the really only good moment this film has.
This movie is overly long and moves at a snails pace.The special effects are tame and homemade looking .In fact they probably are as this whole movie has the look of a film that was shot on a shoestring budget with a cast of 4 or 5 folks.Sometimes that works but in this film it doesn't.This movie in one word would be-boring.
Still it is hard for me to hate this film too much because you just know the guy who made this thing poured his heart and soul into it.
But still that doesn't always make for a good movie.
Great movie that could have been better
drnrg311 April 2007
Warning: Spoilers
My review contains spoilers, but also a few ideas to make this an even better movie.
The idea is great. It's about a young man who gets bitten by a zombie and gradually and painfully turns into one himself. Great idea and never done before, but it had to many lose ends. I know all the famous Zombie movies never explain the "why" factor, but at least they are consistent with the idea that it becomes an infectious and contagious disease. Two things we never get in this film. Sure he kills to feed, but his victims never return like they should. Plus it all seem to be an isolated incident ,since we never hear of any zombies outside of the young man' world.
I think it would have been interesting to see how he reacted among other zombies. Perhaps some with the so-called disease at a more advanced state. You want feelings? How about him seeing how other Zombies act and how he ultimately will turn into the mindless killing animal, that they really are. That IMOP would have been more deep than sad masturbation scenes.
Now ,these are things that I did enjoy about the movie. The way it was filmed really gives an authentic almost "Home Movie" feeling. That in turn lets us identify with him as a really suffering person. The decaying portion of the young man is also pretty good. Meaning the way he reacts when he sees himself in the mirror and other dream sequences are really credible. I guess the isolation factor is treated according to who he was. A very boring ,unintersting man, but loving his girlfriend as much as he seems to, he should have confided in her. I too would have like to see that aspect of their lives.
I already mentioned the infamous masturbation scene. It's not bad. Sad if anything. Actually that is the part where one gets the idea he has finally given up. It is very sad to believe his connection with his girlfriend was based solely in that act.
Like I said ,the movie has potential. I like it ,because it is different to other Zombie movies, but for a more realistic self decaying movie, look for "The Incredible Melting Man"
The idea is great. It's about a young man who gets bitten by a zombie and gradually and painfully turns into one himself. Great idea and never done before, but it had to many lose ends. I know all the famous Zombie movies never explain the "why" factor, but at least they are consistent with the idea that it becomes an infectious and contagious disease. Two things we never get in this film. Sure he kills to feed, but his victims never return like they should. Plus it all seem to be an isolated incident ,since we never hear of any zombies outside of the young man' world.
I think it would have been interesting to see how he reacted among other zombies. Perhaps some with the so-called disease at a more advanced state. You want feelings? How about him seeing how other Zombies act and how he ultimately will turn into the mindless killing animal, that they really are. That IMOP would have been more deep than sad masturbation scenes.
Now ,these are things that I did enjoy about the movie. The way it was filmed really gives an authentic almost "Home Movie" feeling. That in turn lets us identify with him as a really suffering person. The decaying portion of the young man is also pretty good. Meaning the way he reacts when he sees himself in the mirror and other dream sequences are really credible. I guess the isolation factor is treated according to who he was. A very boring ,unintersting man, but loving his girlfriend as much as he seems to, he should have confided in her. I too would have like to see that aspect of their lives.
I already mentioned the infamous masturbation scene. It's not bad. Sad if anything. Actually that is the part where one gets the idea he has finally given up. It is very sad to believe his connection with his girlfriend was based solely in that act.
Like I said ,the movie has potential. I like it ,because it is different to other Zombie movies, but for a more realistic self decaying movie, look for "The Incredible Melting Man"
Do Not Watch!!!
christy_difranco12 August 2004
This movies is horrible. Do not waste your time watching it. It is so boring, and there is hardly any death or gore. The whole movie is about some guy who gets bit by a zombie, then starts recording himself talking about how bad it is to be becoming a zombie, and how he hates eating people but has to. Then there is his girlfriend who he is still in love with and dreams about. And don't forget the unnecessary scenes of him whacking it until it falls off. This movie sucks!!! Whatever you do, do not mistake this for a good movie, or one that is worth watching. It is the most boring zombie movie I have ever seen, and I have seen some boring zombie movies. Who ever said horror buffs will enjoy this one, was sadly mistaken.
I have mixed feelings about this film...
hardcoremoose9 January 2000
Overall, this film is a mixed bag.
The acting is acceptable and the production values are decent. There are plot holes, but given the budget and subject matter, these can be overlooked. This film is more about mood anyway, and the actors and director do a good job of establishing that without digressing to unintentinal camp and humor, as often happens with zero-budget films. Some of the dialogue is a bit stilted, but the actors pull it off with a fair degree of credibility (the fact that they are British helps; their proper way of speaking helps with the goofy-sounding verbiage).
The real problem with this film is that there's not enough going on in it. There is some violence, some of it disturbing, but a little more action would have made this film a lot more entertaining.
This film is good for a rental, but you won't get enough viewings out of it to make it worth owning.
The acting is acceptable and the production values are decent. There are plot holes, but given the budget and subject matter, these can be overlooked. This film is more about mood anyway, and the actors and director do a good job of establishing that without digressing to unintentinal camp and humor, as often happens with zero-budget films. Some of the dialogue is a bit stilted, but the actors pull it off with a fair degree of credibility (the fact that they are British helps; their proper way of speaking helps with the goofy-sounding verbiage).
The real problem with this film is that there's not enough going on in it. There is some violence, some of it disturbing, but a little more action would have made this film a lot more entertaining.
This film is good for a rental, but you won't get enough viewings out of it to make it worth owning.
A vicious critique of a truly horrendous film.
mykl-48 September 2004
After watching this pathetic piece of dreck I threw it in the garbage, nobody should have to endure such drivel. I can only assume that the actors were handed the ass-wiping of a baboon and told to interpret them. The story basically follows a young mans decent into zombidom delivered in an uncomfortable mix of monologue and documentary style interviews. You get to listen to his sensitive soul-searching in between murders and corpse munching. Gore hounds don't get your hopes up the few scenes you might be interested in are far and few and the effects fairly abysmal. Near the end of the film the main character has rotted to the point of being unrecognizable yet his clothes remain remarkably tidy. You might expect all those oozing sores to have leaked through, I guess he must of been using his Arid Extra Dry. There is only fifteen to twenty minutes of material, a handful of scenes repeated ad-nauseum that build up to him, get this, pulling off his own penis while masturbating over photos of the girl he loves and had to leave behind. The actors probably have some talent but they had nothing to work with. The only redeeming quality was the decent camera work. Andrew Parkinson who wrote and directed this should be taken out into a field and pummeled for unleashing this monstrosity on and unsuspecting public.
very sad...
gothfuqqinzilla29 April 2003
This was a very sad movie actually. This is the first movie to make you feel sorry for the zombie. A sad descent from humanity, to animal. The budget was low, but, it looked great. The acting was actually pretty good. Didn't seem so much like someone acting, was almost like watching a home movie. Horror buffs should enjoy this one.
Great concept, poor execution.
reallifestory20 September 2001
I think that the premise for this experimental sort of film was great and very original. Instead of treating "zombieism" as purely supernatural, as a bunch of brainless monsters, this film presents it more like a "disease". It details the trials of a man afflicted by the disease, after having been bitten by a zombie, trying to carry on his old life as normally as possible. However, there is no way that he can completely hide his condition and it eventually gets the best of him.
Unfortunately, the quality of the film is poor. The technical aspects of filmmaking are suffering in this movie. Very harsh, unattractive lighting, blown out whites, drab color, low quality sound...things like this and other complaints concerning detail really detract from what could have been a great film. Regardless, this is definitely worth seeing for genre fans, especially ones who can appreciate a more intelligent approach to horror. Casual fans or total action/gore fans should not bother.
Unfortunately, the quality of the film is poor. The technical aspects of filmmaking are suffering in this movie. Very harsh, unattractive lighting, blown out whites, drab color, low quality sound...things like this and other complaints concerning detail really detract from what could have been a great film. Regardless, this is definitely worth seeing for genre fans, especially ones who can appreciate a more intelligent approach to horror. Casual fans or total action/gore fans should not bother.
Zombies as science
lastliberal25 October 2008
The more zombie movies you watch, the more twists you come across.
I am currently reading Zombie CSU to see if forensic science can discover and/or combat an outbreak of zombies.
Andrew Parkinson, writer/director/producer/cameraman/editor/actor in this indy film, presents us with a documentary-style approach.
The individual infected was doing research and continued that research as he deteriorated. He logged his mental and physical deterioration, and we saw his emotional deterioration as well.
There were some funny and interesting things in the film. He managed to consume his victims with wine and a cigarette afterwards. he maintained his full faculties until the end.
The physical deterioration is something to see and quite amazing. I would not spoil it for those who want to see this film, but is does get hilarious.
If you are looking for something different, then this is it.
I am currently reading Zombie CSU to see if forensic science can discover and/or combat an outbreak of zombies.
Andrew Parkinson, writer/director/producer/cameraman/editor/actor in this indy film, presents us with a documentary-style approach.
The individual infected was doing research and continued that research as he deteriorated. He logged his mental and physical deterioration, and we saw his emotional deterioration as well.
There were some funny and interesting things in the film. He managed to consume his victims with wine and a cigarette afterwards. he maintained his full faculties until the end.
The physical deterioration is something to see and quite amazing. I would not spoil it for those who want to see this film, but is does get hilarious.
If you are looking for something different, then this is it.
I Zombie-The Chronicles of Boredom
Uriah437 January 2022
This film begins with a young man by the name of "Mark" (Giles Aspen) collecting samples in the woods for a research project when he comes upon what appears to be an abandoned house. Upon further investigation, however, he finds a man's decomposing body inside the building along with a woman writhing in pain on the floor. Being the thoughtful person that he is, he immediately tries to help but is bitten by her in the attempt. Although he manages to escape from the house, from that point on his body gradually deteriorates to the point that his transition to an actual zombie takes place-along with the craving for human flesh in the process. Now rather than reveal any more, I will just say that this film started off rather well but lost steam after the first 30 minutes or so to the point that everything slowed down dramatically afterward. Admittedly, Giles Aspen put in a solid performance but the film itself was simply too long for the minimal material he was given-causing the picture as a whole to suffer accordingly. Everything seemed too dull and lifeless and I have rated this film accordingly.
Sympathy for a Zombie
Semih7 June 2000
Warning: Spoilers
I think this movie was based on one of the best ideas I've ever seen for a zombie film. You feel so sorry for this guy who has been bitten and infected and who is turning to a zombie. Suddenly he starts craving for human flesh. He doesn't want to kill but he realizes he has to in order to survive. So you end up with a body in a living room, on a plastic sheet, and this guy kneeling over him and eating him with a very normal, serious looking face; as if he's having leftovers from thanksgiving dinner. He had a girlfriend but he has to leave her, even though he loves her very much. The following might be a spoiler!: And all he can do is masturbate by looking at her photo (which seems to be a very natural behavior under such circumstances). Slowly slowly he begins to rott like a corpse. And we have a beautiful scene in which he is again masturbating looking at his girlfriend's photo and what happens?! His dick falls off into his hand!! And we, the audience, can feel his pain and misery! And thank god that we aren't in his place.
This movie looks like its made on an extremely low budget. Lighting and acting looks pretty amateur. However the lighting in particular gives a very natural and realistic feel to the film; almost as if it was shot with a home camcorder. But simply the idea and the slowly paced degeneration makes this movie a delightful treat. We become so attached to this character that we hate to see him just fade off like that. I would recommend this film for people who would want to see what it would be like if a real person was infected with this "zombie-virus" and was slowly turning into a zombie.
But don't expect people walking around, yelling "brain, Brain!"
This movie looks like its made on an extremely low budget. Lighting and acting looks pretty amateur. However the lighting in particular gives a very natural and realistic feel to the film; almost as if it was shot with a home camcorder. But simply the idea and the slowly paced degeneration makes this movie a delightful treat. We become so attached to this character that we hate to see him just fade off like that. I would recommend this film for people who would want to see what it would be like if a real person was infected with this "zombie-virus" and was slowly turning into a zombie.
But don't expect people walking around, yelling "brain, Brain!"
Utter garbage!!
ironhorse_somo20 July 2009
Warning: Spoilers
I was fooled by Fangoria's endorsement of this movie. In my high school days, Fango was a pretty decent "splatter rag," so I picked this one up and rented it. Having seen the movie, I can say Fango must have slipped way down the "cool splatter rag" ladder in the years since then, and this movie is one of the 2 WORST zombie movies I've ever seen.
The overall quality of this movie was awful. I walked away at the end wanting my money back, and wanting to sue the people who made it, and Fangoria magazine for my time back, and the brain cells that died while I was watching it. It's like the star of the movie financed the filming on his credit card (and must have had a $500 limit on his credit card, at that.)
The ONLY part of this movie that was even remotely entertaining was when the (by this point) zombie's penis fell off while he was masturbating. That made for a short burst of hilarious laughter.
The rest of this movie was simply boring. No suspense, no horror, nothing even remotely scary. Just boredom. I could've had an equally good time (except for that one brief moment) going in my back yard and watching the grass grow. Save your money, time, and brain cells! Leave this one on the shelf!!
The overall quality of this movie was awful. I walked away at the end wanting my money back, and wanting to sue the people who made it, and Fangoria magazine for my time back, and the brain cells that died while I was watching it. It's like the star of the movie financed the filming on his credit card (and must have had a $500 limit on his credit card, at that.)
The ONLY part of this movie that was even remotely entertaining was when the (by this point) zombie's penis fell off while he was masturbating. That made for a short burst of hilarious laughter.
The rest of this movie was simply boring. No suspense, no horror, nothing even remotely scary. Just boredom. I could've had an equally good time (except for that one brief moment) going in my back yard and watching the grass grow. Save your money, time, and brain cells! Leave this one on the shelf!!
I Boredom: The Chronicles of Slogging Through Hot Garbage
nkwhitesell7 April 2022
Warning: Spoilers
Found this in the clearance bin back in 2000 for $1.99. Feel like I over paid. Gave it to a friend for free and he insisted I take it back as he "didn't want that trash junk'n up his house". Who could blame him? Use the box to hide a VHS you want to keep safe, because nobody will touch it. When people ask me what the worst movie I've seen is, I point right at this one. The only noteworthy scene is when he jerks his junk right off his body, and even that was poorly executed. Dont bother to rewind it, you'llnever watch it twice. -5/10 Pay me.
Interesting find.
Dolarhyde8 February 2004
This is a low budget so don't expect anything flashy but the idea is very original. I see that others have already stated the plot so i'll just say that i like it as well and recommend it to any horror fan. It's good to see a recent horror film that is original and entertaining at the same time. And now i say to all "Go see Bubba Ho-Tep any way you can!"
A Good Zombie Film
Movieman-15723 September 1999
I was surprised when I first saw this film. I thought it'd be a mean-spirited, spurting gore-for-the-sake-of-gore filled romp. It's not. This first film from Fangoria isn't lighthearted, but it actually tries for sympathy...and gets it. Giles Aspen plays Mark, a man who is bit by a zombie while on some kind of scientific expedition. Slowly, he starts to crave human flesh and get horribly violent convulsions if he goes long enough without it. This creates the feeling that he is an unwitting killer, and not someone that WANTS to kill. His convulsions push him to kill, thus also eliminating the mean-spirited factor in this film. This film raises some questions, like "Why don't his victims come back from the dead?", but I didn't care. I think it's a good zombie film and well executed. It also has a good music score, which the director did. Now, don't take it the wrong way, there is gore, but none of it spurts out. It's just blood gel. It can be hard to find, but I found it at Hollywood Video to rent. Hollywood also carries the second film in the Fangoria movie series, Lady of the Lake, which I haven't seen yet, but plan to. I don't think it'll be as good as this, though.
An overlooked and too often maligned horror masterpiece.
ksmith197 June 2003
I, Zombie may not be exactly the kind of putrid instant gratification Romero or Fulci fans are looking for, but they have much to gain by getting over that fact and watching past the first fifteen minutes. Andrew Parkinson has created a monster of a different breed, and while he nonetheless owes much to the aforementioned predecessors in the genre, he has more in common thematically with Hitchcock or Antonioni (and I'm not invoking those names lightly). Horror fans may complain that I, Zombie is too slow and that nothing really happens, and their sentiments were probably echoed by some of the first viewers of Red Desert. No surprise; essentially, this is textbook European Art Cinema filtered through the rotting flesh of the living dead. The temps morts in the story only serves to heighten the nauseating distress that we feel as we wait for Mark's body to slide off his bones and into complete nothingness. There is definitely not the kind of action-paced gorror that made Dawn of the Dead so awesome in this film, but Parkinson does a more than adequate job of creating a terrifyingly bleak universe via a psychological journey into the life of an emotionally lifeless men. I, Zombie is, ultimately, a metaphor for male sexual neurosis (from homoerotic urges to being capable of deriving pleasure only from pictures of women), and Mark is impotent in the face of a potential understanding of the origins of that neurosis. Science provides no answers and his own intellect can't measure up to the horrifying forces of the primal scene and castration anxiety. The documentary-like interview interludes are much more than the banal and uninsightful commentary that they seem to be, as our vision of Mark's decomposition acquires the horrible weight of a real life experience, a notion reinforced at the end of the film by the montage of photographs of him growing up in backyards not too different from the one you played in when you were seven. Granted, there are some lacking technical moments here: sloppy editing, poorly figured camera angles, and obfuscatory lighting, but there are also moments of formal brilliance (the beginning of the `drill scene') that show an understanding of generic conventions and evince an ability to disrupt them to even more powerful effect. In the end, the few formal faux pas are overshadowed by an incredibly engaging nightmare that you may never be able to forget. The film is funny at times, but that's not its goal; it wants to take you down with it. I, Zombie will probably make you sad, might make you throw up, and will definitely make you think. No question about it: five brilliant stars.
Masturbating Zombie Flick and you thought you´ve seen it all!!!
rogelioduron18 September 2002
This movie is very weird,It started like a good Night of the living dead and finished like a "Steel magonolias" kind of film,This guy gets bitten by a zombie and instead of fraking out and changing into a blood thirsty,Carcass human eating zombie in a matter of seconds he begins decaying just day by day,he just escapes from his old life and begins a new one as a Zombie, the masturbating scenes were not really necesary to make us feel bad about this guy but theyre disturbing. If you must check it out, if you have other choices please take them,this movie is not really that good so you better spend your money on original Zombie flicks, invest Romero. Ill give it a poor 7 out of 10 on Horror zombie masturbating films.
See also
Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews
