Review of First Knight

First Knight (1995)
Even worse than I previously had commented
1 August 2002
When Shakespeare enriched the English language about half a millennium ago, he could not possibly have conceived such a putrid object being created by humanity, and as such he, understandably, did not create a word loathful enough to describe this portion of fecal matter.

I accidentally stumbled upon it two nights ago, and in an act of desperate boredom, I watched a few minutes of it.

The monumental waste of talent in Ben Cross and Sean Connery is offensive. The only performance that belongs in this "movie" is that of Richard Geere, whose ability to under-perform actually slips him below that of the script for lack of quality.

His acting talent and this film substitute are made for each other.

There should be a warning issued before and during the presentation of this...thing, something like the warnings we get for good movies..." Warning, this movie may actually fail to stimulate enough of your brain cells sufficiently to sustain life. Viewer discretion is adviced. If your IQ is greater than your 2 year-old's shoe size, avoid watching this "film" without a defirbulator machine nearby"

This movie is like a cheap wine. it is excellent for putting down in some very dark place and avoiding.
6 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed