IMDb >
New Moon (2009)
Quicklinks
Top Links
trailers and videosfull cast and crewtriviaofficial sitesmemorable quotesOverview
main detailscombined detailsfull cast and crewcompany creditstv scheduleAwards & Reviews
user commentsexternal reviewsnewsgroup reviewsawardsuser ratingsparents guiderecommendationsmessage boardPlot & Quotes
plot summarysynopsisplot keywordsAmazon.com summarymemorable quotesFun Stuff
triviagoofssoundtrack listingcrazy creditsalternate versionsmovie connectionsFAQOther Info
merchandising linksbox office/businessrelease datesfilming locationstechnical specslaserdisc detailsDVD detailsliterature listingsNewsDeskPromotional
taglines trailers and videos posters photo galleryExternal Links
showtimesofficial sitesmiscellaneousphotographssound clipsvideo clipsNew Moon (2009) More at IMDbPro »
| Photos (see all 218 | slideshow) | Videos (see all 51) |
Overview
User Rating:
Director:
Writers (WGA):
Release Date:
20 November 2009 (USA)
more
Tagline:
The Next Chapter Begins
Plot:
After Bella recovers from the vampire attack that almost claimed her life, she looks to celebrate her birthday with Edward and his family...
more
| full synopsis
Plot Keywords:
NewsDesk:
(9632 articles)
"Avatar" Doesn’T Set Record After All 2
(From Studio Briefing - Film News. 22 December 2009, 12:21 PM, PST)
Fox 29: Anna Kendrick Talks Jessica And 'Twilight'
(From TwilightersAnonymous. 22 December 2009, 11:47 AM, PST)
(From Studio Briefing - Film News. 22 December 2009, 12:21 PM, PST)
Fox 29: Anna Kendrick Talks Jessica And 'Twilight'
(From TwilightersAnonymous. 22 December 2009, 11:47 AM, PST)
User Comments:
So BAD I find it funny
more (699 total)
Cast
(Cast overview, first billed only)| Kristen Stewart | ... | Bella Swan | |
| Taylor Lautner | ... | Jacob Black | |
| Robert Pattinson | ... | Edward Cullen | |
| Billy Burke | ... | Charlie Swan | |
| Ashley Greene | ... | Alice Cullen | |
| Anna Kendrick | ... | Jessica | |
| Michael Welch | ... | Mike | |
| Justin Chon | ... | Eric | |
| Christian Serratos | ... | Angela | |
| Christina Jastrzembska | ... | Gran / Bella | |
| Jackson Rathbone | ... | Jasper Hale | |
| Russell Roberts | ... | Mr. Berty | |
| Cam Gigandet | ... | James | |
| Michael Sheen | ... | Aro | |
| Jamie Campbell Bower | ... | Caius |
Additional Details
Also Known As:
The Twilight Saga: New Moon (USA) (promotional title)
Twilight 2 (USA) (informal title)
Twilight: New Moon (USA) (informal title)
Untitled Sports Movie (Canada: English title) (fake working title)
more
Twilight 2 (USA) (informal title)
Twilight: New Moon (USA) (informal title)
Untitled Sports Movie (Canada: English title) (fake working title)
more
MPAA:
Rated PG-13 for some violence and action.
Parents Guide:
Runtime:
130 min
Country:
Language:
Color:
Aspect Ratio:
2.35 : 1 more
Sound Mix:
Certification:
Japan:G |
USA:PG-13 (certificate #45662) |
Sweden:11 |
Norway:11 |
Ireland:12A |
Switzerland:12 (canton of Vaud) |
Switzerland:12 (canton of Geneva) |
Singapore:PG |
Philippines:G (MTRCB) |
Thailand:G |
Brazil:12 |
Portugal:M/12 |
South Korea:12 |
Netherlands:12 |
Australia:M |
UK:12A |
Hong Kong:IIA
Filming Locations:
Company:
Fun Stuff
Trivia:
Robert Pattinson refused to have his eyebrows waxed as extensively as he had in the first movie, resulting in a slightly bushier look on Edward.
more
Goofs:
Continuity: In the scene after Bella finds out from Laurent that Victoria is after her, she is sleeping in her bed. The dream catcher is hanging to the side of the round circle on the headboard. After Jacob climbs into Bella's room - he focuses on the dream catcher. The straps are now encircling the headboard.
more
Quotes:
Movie Connections:
Referenced in "The Office: Secret Santa (#6.12)" (2009)
more
Soundtrack:
La Cathédrale engloutie
more
FAQ
How much sex, violence, and profanity are in this movie?Will Alice's yellow Porsche be in the movie?
Why is the movie called, "The Twilight Saga: New Moon" rather than just "New Moon"?
more
more (699 total)
Message Boards
Discuss this movie with other users on IMDb message board for New Moon (2009) moreRecommendations
If you enjoyed this title, our database also recommends:
Show more recommendations
|
|
|
|
|
| Twilight | Carrie | Stardust | Trick or Treat | The Notebook |
|
IMDb User Rating:
|
IMDb User Rating:
|
IMDb User Rating:
|
IMDb User Rating:
|
IMDb User Rating:
|
Related Links
| Full cast and crew | Company credits | External reviews |
| News articles | IMDb Drama section | IMDb USA section |
| Add this title to MyMovies |
















I've read all the books. I know what happens. This never ruins a film for me.
I didn't want to see this film because the previous one was lacking in... well... everything. But girlfriend wanted to see it. I went in and was instantly surprised to see the demographic had widened past 12-16 year old girls who instantly swoon at any even remotely hot guy so that was interesting. It's not relevant to how good the film was- it just reaffirmed to me (and should to all of you) that hating a series on principle or having preconceived notions of how bad something will be is unfair on it.
Not in this case. It was still bad. BUT worth the money I payed to see it because though it most definitely not intended to be entertaining in the way I found it. It was full of melodramatic dialogue and bad acting which, if you take ANY Drama classes at school- Which Robert DIDN'T- you'll notice certain things about how people deliver lines. You notice how they're SAYING lines they have memorised with unnatural and stylised emphasis on the key words in the sentences without giving the (cheesy) dialogue depth or realism. Quite simply, it was so terrible I found myself resisting the urge to burst out laughing in a room full of fans who were probably misinterpreting the melodrama as "Good, emotional drama." No. This film is ridiculous.
As it goes further on it gets less tightly stitched together and I had to become reliant on my knowledge of the books to fill in and pick up the slight gaps in dialogue and plot. They would say things that are based on something that didn't happen on screen (probably deleted scene for time) or their dialogue would just be terrible unrealistic lines that are work as standalone ones for a trailer but in conversation it seems like they're jumping slightly just to get to say something that is dramatic without it actually making too much sense.
BUT! It does have SOME redeeming qualities! The melodrama wasn't nonstop hilarity so thankfully something else held my attention. There was actual effort put into this film. The fight scenes actually used REAL special effects (something the first film was a bit cheap on) which actually looked kinda impressive. Any action was short lived unfortunately but what little there was, they did a reasonable job with.
I was impressed at the presence of transition. The previous film jumped and skipped and the next plot point just WAS without having been caused. This film (until near the end, of course) actually had a pace and a coherency to it that allows you to understand it without reading the books. This is a bonus. Certain things you'd think would drag on as the director tries to give you time to let the "emotion" "sink in" thankfully didn't take forever and the entire movie fit almost snuggly into its 2 hour length. Too bad it fell apart more and more it went along.
The film also shares the semi-awkward character interactions that create the same humour as the first one. Not as deliberately funny as the first one (though, as I said, it was pretty hilarious when it wasn't meant to be) though.
Though it was many failings with only a few things to back it up as being a reasonable film it will definitely make all you little teenage girls out there desperate to see Jacob's hell tanked up body very happy. You can HEAR the audience's reaction the first time Jacob takes his shirt off. He's got all you need: Pecs, biceps, ABS OF STEEL and minimal clothing. Too bad he lacks depth and real character. (Girls love obsessively devoted Zombies, they don't think enough to complain) It is NO WAY even NEAR one of the best films of 2009. NO ONE should say this ridiculous claim.
Really tossing up between 3 and 4 stars. Mmm. I guess a movie's highlight shouldn't be how low it sinks. 3.