IMDb > New Moon (2009)
New Moon
Quicklinks
Top Links
trailers and videosfull cast and crewtriviaofficial sitesmemorable quotes
Overview
main detailscombined detailsfull cast and crewcompany creditstv schedule
Awards & Reviews
user commentsexternal reviewsnewsgroup reviewsawardsuser ratingsparents guiderecommendationsmessage board
Plot & Quotes
plot summarysynopsisplot keywordsAmazon.com summarymemorable quotes
Fun Stuff
triviagoofssoundtrack listingcrazy creditsalternate versionsmovie connectionsFAQ
Other Info
merchandising linksbox office/businessrelease datesfilming locationstechnical specslaserdisc detailsDVD detailsliterature listingsNewsDesk
Promotional
taglines trailers and videos posters photo gallery
External Links
showtimesofficial sitesmiscellaneousphotographssound clipsvideo clips
Photos (see all 218 | slideshow) Videos (see all 51)
New Moon (2009) -- The "Never Hurt You" TV spot for The Twilight Saga: New Moon.
New Moon (2009) -- Clip describing the creation and dynamics of the New Moon wolf pack.
New Moon (2009) -- Volturi Featurette from The Twilight Saga: New Moon
"60 Minutes" (1968): :  -- The premiere television News magazine.
New Moon (2009) -- The Twilight Saga: New Moon - “Event” - TV Spot

Overview

User Rating:
4.6/10   41,481 votes
MOVIEmeter: ?
Down 25% in popularity this week. See why on IMDbPro.
Director:
Writers (WGA):
Melissa Rosenberg (screenplay)
Stephenie Meyer (novel)
Contact:
View company contact information for New Moon on IMDbPro.
Release Date:
20 November 2009 (USA) more
Tagline:
The Next Chapter Begins
Plot:
After Bella recovers from the vampire attack that almost claimed her life, she looks to celebrate her birthday with Edward and his family... more | full synopsis
NewsDesk:
(9632 articles)
User Comments:
So BAD I find it funny more (699 total)

Cast

  (Cast overview, first billed only)

Additional Details

Also Known As:
The Twilight Saga: New Moon (USA) (promotional title)
Twilight 2 (USA) (informal title)
Twilight: New Moon (USA) (informal title)
Untitled Sports Movie (Canada: English title) (fake working title)
more
MPAA:
Rated PG-13 for some violence and action.
Runtime:
130 min
Country:
Language:
Color:
Aspect Ratio:
2.35 : 1 more
Sound Mix:

Fun Stuff

Trivia:
Robert Pattinson refused to have his eyebrows waxed as extensively as he had in the first movie, resulting in a slightly bushier look on Edward. more
Goofs:
Continuity: In the scene after Bella finds out from Laurent that Victoria is after her, she is sleeping in her bed. The dream catcher is hanging to the side of the round circle on the headboard. After Jacob climbs into Bella's room - he focuses on the dream catcher. The straps are now encircling the headboard. more
Quotes:
Aro: What will we do with you now?
Marcus: You already know what you're going to do, Aro.
Caius: She knows too much. She's a liablity.
Aro: That's true...
more
Movie Connections:
Soundtrack:
La Cathédrale engloutie more

FAQ

How much sex, violence, and profanity are in this movie?
Will Alice's yellow Porsche be in the movie?
Why is the movie called, "The Twilight Saga: New Moon" rather than just "New Moon"?
more
719 out of 1136 people found the following comment useful.
So BAD I find it funny, 19 November 2009
3/10
Author: crazybilby from Australia

I've read all the books. I know what happens. This never ruins a film for me.

I didn't want to see this film because the previous one was lacking in... well... everything. But girlfriend wanted to see it. I went in and was instantly surprised to see the demographic had widened past 12-16 year old girls who instantly swoon at any even remotely hot guy so that was interesting. It's not relevant to how good the film was- it just reaffirmed to me (and should to all of you) that hating a series on principle or having preconceived notions of how bad something will be is unfair on it.

Not in this case. It was still bad. BUT worth the money I payed to see it because though it most definitely not intended to be entertaining in the way I found it. It was full of melodramatic dialogue and bad acting which, if you take ANY Drama classes at school- Which Robert DIDN'T- you'll notice certain things about how people deliver lines. You notice how they're SAYING lines they have memorised with unnatural and stylised emphasis on the key words in the sentences without giving the (cheesy) dialogue depth or realism. Quite simply, it was so terrible I found myself resisting the urge to burst out laughing in a room full of fans who were probably misinterpreting the melodrama as "Good, emotional drama." No. This film is ridiculous.

As it goes further on it gets less tightly stitched together and I had to become reliant on my knowledge of the books to fill in and pick up the slight gaps in dialogue and plot. They would say things that are based on something that didn't happen on screen (probably deleted scene for time) or their dialogue would just be terrible unrealistic lines that are work as standalone ones for a trailer but in conversation it seems like they're jumping slightly just to get to say something that is dramatic without it actually making too much sense.

BUT! It does have SOME redeeming qualities! The melodrama wasn't nonstop hilarity so thankfully something else held my attention. There was actual effort put into this film. The fight scenes actually used REAL special effects (something the first film was a bit cheap on) which actually looked kinda impressive. Any action was short lived unfortunately but what little there was, they did a reasonable job with.

I was impressed at the presence of transition. The previous film jumped and skipped and the next plot point just WAS without having been caused. This film (until near the end, of course) actually had a pace and a coherency to it that allows you to understand it without reading the books. This is a bonus. Certain things you'd think would drag on as the director tries to give you time to let the "emotion" "sink in" thankfully didn't take forever and the entire movie fit almost snuggly into its 2 hour length. Too bad it fell apart more and more it went along.

The film also shares the semi-awkward character interactions that create the same humour as the first one. Not as deliberately funny as the first one (though, as I said, it was pretty hilarious when it wasn't meant to be) though.

Though it was many failings with only a few things to back it up as being a reasonable film it will definitely make all you little teenage girls out there desperate to see Jacob's hell tanked up body very happy. You can HEAR the audience's reaction the first time Jacob takes his shirt off. He's got all you need: Pecs, biceps, ABS OF STEEL and minimal clothing. Too bad he lacks depth and real character. (Girls love obsessively devoted Zombies, they don't think enough to complain) It is NO WAY even NEAR one of the best films of 2009. NO ONE should say this ridiculous claim.

Really tossing up between 3 and 4 stars. Mmm. I guess a movie's highlight shouldn't be how low it sinks. 3.

Was the above comment useful to you?
more (699 total)

Message Boards

Discuss this movie with other users on IMDb message board for New Moon (2009)
Recent Posts (updated daily)User
what makes Steph meyer a bad writter?? lamb_y84
Should Midnight Sun Be Made Into A Movie LLOwens
BELLA + EDWARD The Most Dull And Boring Couple EVER! TanayaScar
Taylor Lautner (Jacob) cannot act/etc...!! (possible spoilers) corvinos
4.6? Are you kidding? eric-membrey
more

Recommendations

If you enjoyed this title, our database also recommends:
- - - - -
Twilight Carrie Stardust Trick or Treat The Notebook
IMDb User Rating:
IMDb User Rating:
IMDb User Rating:
IMDb User Rating:
IMDb User Rating:
Show more recommendations

Related Links

Full cast and crew Company credits External reviews
News articles IMDb Drama section IMDb USA section
Add this title to MyMovies

You may report errors and omissions on this page to the IMDb database managers. They will be examined and if approved will be included in a future update. Clicking the 'Update' button will take you through a step-by-step process.